AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT D. THOMPSON, APPELLANT, v. DONALD SELSKY, AS DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT/INMATE DISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

After receiving an administrative determination on February 21, 2000 which found him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the Statute of Limitations because the executed order to show cause and petition were not filed in the Albany County Clerk's office until June 26, 2000.

Given the recent decision in Matter of Grant v. Senkowski ( 95 N.Y.2d 605), the Attorney-General notes that inasmuch as petitioner's affidavit in support of the order to show cause, verified petition and memorandum of law were received by the court clerk on June 12, 2000, which constitutes the date of the commencement of this proceeding (see,id.), respondent is withdrawing his timeliness objection on Statute of Limitations grounds. Because respondent has not answered the petition in this matter, the judgment is vacated and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court to permit respondent to serve an answer within 45 days of this Court's decision.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court to permit respondent to serve an answer within 45 days of this Court's decision.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF THOMPSON v. SELSKY
(May 10, 2001)