Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RALPH W. HOLMIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRW, INC., Defendant-Appellant,and CARMINE COPPOLA, RUTH E. MILLER, ARTHUR B. BRANSTINE and SYNNEXINFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants.

PER CURIAM

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lesemann's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 330 N.J. Super. 30 (2000).

For reversal and remandment — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA and ZAZZALI — 7.

Opposed — none.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOLMIN v. TRW, INC
(May 9, 2001)