ORDERED that the plaintiff's notice of appeal is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701[c]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly struck the plaintiff's errata sheet to his deposition transcript. The errata sheet lacked a statement of the reasons for making the corrections, and the plaintiff provided only an omnibus reason for making his corrections in opposition to the motion after the 60-day time limit for making such changes (see, CPLR 3116[a]; Rodriguez v. Jones, 227 A.D.2d 220; Marine Trust Co. of Western New York v. Collins, 19 A.D.2d 857).
RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORIO and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.