The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Issues of credibility were properly presented to the jury and there is no reason to disturb its determinations.
Defendant's claim that the court improperly assisted the prosecutor during the suppression hearing is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Charleston, 56 N.Y.2d 886), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court's advice to the prosecutor that he should elicit additional testimony was entirely appropriate (see, People v. Moulton, 43 N.Y.2d 944; People v. Soto, 210 A.D.2d 5, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 1039).
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.
Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.