Since defendant controverted his persistent felony offender status and did not receive copies of his predicate violent felony offender statements until the day of sentencing, he was statutorily entitled to an adjournment of the hearing for at least two days upon his request (see, CPL 400.15; 400.16[2]; People v. Shabazz, 104 A.D.2d 776,lv denied 64 N.Y.2d 654). In addition, although defendant's predicate convictions were more than 10 years old, the statements were incomplete in that they did not set forth the date of commencement and the date of termination, as well as the place of imprisonment, for each period of incarceration as is required to toll the 10-year period after which a previous conviction may not be used for purposes of sentencing as a second or persistent violent felony offender (see, CPL 400.15; 400.16[2]; Penal Law § 70.04[b][iv]; § 70.08[1]). To the extent that any of these issues were not properly preserved, we choose to review them in the interest of justice. Accordingly, defendant is entitled to resentencing with further proceedings on his persistent violent felony offender status, including the filing by the People of proper predicate statements (see, People v. Sailor, 65 N.Y.2d 224, cert denied 474 U.S. 982).