AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARION MILLER, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JIM DUFFY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to restore the action is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

When the plaintiffs failed to appear at a scheduled pretrial conference, the action was marked "off" and ultimately dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, inter alia, denied that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to restore the action. We reverse insofar as appealed from.

For the reasons stated in Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv. ( A.D.2d [2d Dept., May 14, 2001]), CPLR 3404 is not applicable because the action was not on the trial calendar. Thus, that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to restore the action is granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLER v. DUFFY
(Jun 11, 2001)