AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH BRUNSON, APPELLANT.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because of improper comments made by the prosecutor during summation. However, the challenged statements were either fair comment on the evidence adduced at trial or fair responses to the defense counsel's summation (see, People v. Cook, A.D.2d [2d Dept., Apr. 16, 2001]; People v. Garcia, 273 A.D.2d 402; People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953) and, in any event, without merit (see generally, People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BRUNSON
(Jun 11, 2001)