Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Charles Berkman (Ephrem Wertenteil, New York, N.Y., of counsel), for appellant. Brea Yankowitz Sosin, P.C., Floral Park, N.Y. (Patrick J. Brea and Glenn E. Westrick of counsel), for respondent Bon Realty Corp. Kral Clerkin Redmond Ryan Perry Girvan, Smithtown, N Y (James V. Derenze of counsel), for respondent Genovese Drug Stores, Inc.
Judges
  • Robert J. Miller
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Charles Berkman (Ephrem Wertenteil, New York, N.Y., of counsel), for appellant. Brea Yankowitz Sosin, P.C., Floral Park, N.Y. (Patrick J. Brea and Glenn E. Westrick of counsel), for respondent Bon Realty Corp. Kral Clerkin Redmond Ryan Perry Girvan, Smithtown, N Y (James V. Derenze of counsel), for respondent Genovese Drug Stores, Inc.
Judges
  • Robert J. Miller
See more information ...
Smart Summary

MADELINE SCOCA, APPELLANT, v. BON REALTY CORP., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants separately moved pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint based on the plaintiff's failure to comply with court-ordered discovery. The Supreme Court granted those motions upon the plaintiff's default in opposing them. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default. Therefore, her motion was properly denied (see, Wynne v. Wagner, 262 A.D.2d 556; Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SCOCA v. BON REALTY CORP
(Jun 11, 2001)