AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ERIC McIVER SNEDDON, ETC., ET AL., respondents, v. SCOTT DOUGLAS, ET AL., appellants.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs demonstrated prima facie entitlement to summary judgment upon proof sufficient to show that, while the defendant Scott Douglas was attempting to park his car in a parking lot, the car suddenly accelerated, striking the infant plaintiff. The defendants failed to make a sufficient showing of a non-negligent explanation for the accident. Douglas admitted that the transmission of his vehicle was faulty, and that he had known of its tendency to slip out of gear for at least two years prior to the accident. Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557; cf., Schuster v. Amboy Bus Co., 267 A.D.2d 448; Liana v. Atacil Contr., 212 A.D.2d 673).

BRACKEN, P.J., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SNEDDON v. DOUGLAS
(Jun 18, 2001)