Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Anthony Laska, Respondent, vs. Metropolitan Council, Self-Insured, Respondent, and Special Compensation Fund, Relator. Donald Flower, Respondent, vs. Metropolitan Council, Self-Insured, Respondent, and Special Compensation Fund, Relator.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 28, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Each employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Associate Justice

PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LASKA v. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
(Jun 28, 2001)