AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. DORRELL WASHINGTON, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request for an adjournment to secure the attendance of two additional witnesses. The defendant did not demonstrate due diligence in seeking to secure the attendance of these witnesses (see, People v. Degondea, 269 A.D.2d 243; People v. Queen, 258 A.D.2d 480; People v. Blasini, 253 A.D.2d 886).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WASHINGTON
(Jul 2, 2001)