MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
The misbehavior report charging petitioner with fighting, violent conduct and refusing a direct order was sufficiently detailed to give petitioner adequate notice of the charges and to permit him to prepare a defense (see, Matter of Green v. Senkowski, 276 A.D.2d 1006). In addition, the misbehavior report and testimony of its author provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of the charges (see, Matter of Rossi v. Portuondo, 277 A.D.2d 615,lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 706 [Feb. 20, 2001]), and petitioner's contrary version of the incident created a question of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Arias v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 807). Although the Hearing Officer had no obligation to call witnesses not requested by petitioner (see, Matter of Faison v. Stinson, 221 A.D.2d 746), he nevertheless had the authority to do so (see, e.g., Matter of Collazo v. Coombe, 235 A.D.2d 654; Matter of Lindsay v. Coughlin, 211 A.D.2d 920), particularly where, as here, the author of the misbehavior report was called to provide further details of the incident after petitioner questioned the sufficiency of the report. Petitioner's remaining claims, including Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and are without merit.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.