ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions that the lineup was unduly suggestive because the police failed to correct for height and hairstyle differences, and that the People failed to prove that one of his victims sustained a serious injury, are without merit (see, People v. Briggs, A.D.2d [decided herewith]).
The defendant's claim that the jury charge on attempted robbery in the first degree was erroneous is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit.
RITTER, J.P., FRIEDMANN, LUCIANO and SMITH, JJ., concur.