AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. DAVID COLLIC, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly admitted into evidence photographs depicting the murder victim. The photographs were admitted to indicate to the jury the location and extent of the victim's wounds, to help establish the People's case that the victim was killed intentionally, and to corroborate the medical examiner's testimony (see, People v. Wood, 79 N.Y.2d 958; People v. Pobliner, 32 N.Y.2d 356; People v. Deberry, 234 A.D.2d 470; People v. Ponce, 213 A.D.2d 725).

O'BRIEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SMITH and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COLLIC
(Jul 9, 2001)