ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the note of issue is vacated, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
The plaintiffs' certificate of readiness incorrectly stated that all pretrial discovery had been completed. Because this was a misstatement of a material fact, the filing of the note of issue was a nullity, and should have been vacated (see, 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; Garofalo v. Mercy Hosp., 271 A.D.2d 642; Spilky v. TRW, Inc., 225 A.D.2d 539).
In addition, as a consequence of the plaintiffs' failure to comply with a conditional order of dismissal, that order became absolute. To be relieved from the adverse impact of the order of dismissal, the plaintiffs had to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to comply with the discovery demands, and the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see, Liotti v. Ruk, A.D.2d [2d Dept., Apr. 30, 2001]; Kepple v. Hill Assocs., 275 A.D.2d 299). The plaintiffs did not meet this burden, and therefore, the complaint should have been dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant.
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.
RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, McGINITY, SMITH and COZIER, JJ., concur.