Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Petition of Wayne E. COGHILL, dba Allstate Siding Supply Co., Petitioner, v. The filings of the NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION INSURANCE, Respondent below, and SAIF Corporation, Respondent.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our decision in Coghill v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 155 Or. App. 601, 964 P.2d 1085 (1998), in which we upheld a determination that petitioner was required to provide workers' compensation coverage for certain siding installers in his employ. Petitioner contends that we made a factual error when we stated that "[t]he record before us does not show that installers worked with or for any other parties during the audit period." We agree with petitioner that there is information in the record to support a finding that the installers worked for other people during the audit period. Hence, we modify our earlier opinion to delete the quoted sentence. The deletion of the sentence does not change the reasoning on which we relied to uphold the agency's decision, and we adhere to our opinion as modified.

Petitioner also seeks reconsideration in a companion case, Coghill v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 155 Or. App. 638, 964 P.2d 1090 (1998). We have denied that petition by order this date.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE COGHILL
(Sep 16, 1998)