AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. FORDAY KOMARA, APPELLANT.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). The inconsistencies in the trial testimony of the police officers who participated in the "buy and bust" operation that resulted in the defendant's arrest were minor and were properly placed before the jury for resolution (see, People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KOMARA
(Aug 20, 2001)