ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that a court file was improperly admitted into evidence pursuant to the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see, CPLR 4518) because no adequate foundation was laid. However, the defendant's failure to object to the admission of the file or the accompanying foundation testimony at trial renders his present contention unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Hutchinson, 255 A.D.2d 396; People v. Antongiorgi, 242 A.D.2d 578). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit (see, People v. Sanchez, 260 A.D.2d 178; People v. Edmonds, 251 A.D.2d 197; People v. Pierre, 157 A.D.2d 750).