Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WARD v. BERRY.

MILLER, Judge.

Keith Berry instituted dispossessory proceedings against Jerry and Sharon Ward. After a bench trial the court granted Berry a writ of possession and judgment in the amount of $600. The Wards appeal, arguing that the court "failed to consider whether [they] had any duties to Keith Berry." The appellate record, however, does not include a transcript of the trial.

Where an appeal is taken which draws in question the transcript of the evidence and proceedings, it shall be the duty of the appellant to have the transcript prepared at his expense. Thus, where the transcript is necessary for the review and appellant omits it from the record on appeal, the appellate court must assume the judgment below was correct and affirm.

As the Wards' enumeration requires consideration of evidence presented at trial, in the absence of a transcript, we must assume the court's judgment was correct and affirm.

Judgment affirmed. Andrews, P.J., and Eldridge, J., concur.

MILLER, Judge.

DECIDED AUGUST 27, 2001.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WARD v. BERRY
(Aug 27, 2001)