AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. DAWIDA SAAD, APPELLANT.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal does not foreclose review of his contention that he did not violate a condition of his plea (see, People v. Miles, 268 A.D.2d 489). The Supreme Court clearly intended to condition the promised sentence upon the defendant's completion of a drug treatment program. Because the defendant failed to complete the program, the Supreme Court was no longer bound by its promise and was free to impose a harsher sentence (see, People v. Gamble, 111 A.D.2d 869).

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, McGINITY, SMITH and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SAAD
(Sep 24, 2001)