Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF OWOSSO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES POUILLON, Defendant-Appellant.

COA: 222098, Shiawassee CC: 96-007653-AR

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November 9, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. On remand, there is no need to address the defendant's challenge to the ordinance under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000-bb, because the Supreme Court has held the provision was beyond Congress' enforcement powers under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment in City of Boerne v Flores, 521 U.S. 507; 117 S.Ct. 2157; 138 L.Ed.2d 264 (1997). See Gentala v City of Tucson, 244 F.3d 1065, 1070 n9 (CA 9, 2001).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF OWOSSO v. POUILLON
(Sep 25, 2001)