AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. JOHN SMOCUM, APPELLANT.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, no Batson violation occurred during jury selection (see, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79). The Supreme Court properly determined that the race-neutral explanation proffered by the prosecutor for the challenge was not merely pretextual (see, People v. Payne, 88 N.Y.2d 172; People v. Allen, 86 N.Y.2d 101).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, LUCIANO and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SMOCUM
(Sep 24, 2001)