Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALFRED WAXLER v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY.

PER CURIAM

[¶ 1] Alfred Waxler appeals from an order entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) granting Central Maine Power Company's (CMP) motion for a summary judgment on Waxler's claims for breach of a statutory obligation to provide electrical service, negligence, and conversion by wrongful interference. On appeal, Waxler contends that the Superior Court erred in concluding that CMP was not negligent and was, therefore, entitled to a summary judgment.

[¶ 2] Waxler's suit was based on CMP's action in disconnecting electrical service from a property owned by Waxler after being ordered to do so by the Chief Electrical Inspector for the City of Portland. CMP's actions, complying with the mandate of the City of Portland's Electrical Code, §§ 6-34, 6-57 and 6-71, were required by law. They were not negligent.

[¶ 3] Waxler's suit in Superior Court and this appeal are both wholly frivolous. Accordingly, pursuant to M.R. App. P. 13(f), CMP is awarded treble costs for this appeal, plus $500 for their attorney fees for defending the suit and this appeal.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed. CMP awarded treble costs for this appeal and $500 towards their attorney fees.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WAXLER v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER
(Sep 20, 2001)