ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly imposed consecutive sentences. The evidence at trial demonstrated that the defendant's acts underlying the crimes were separate and distinct (see, People v. Ramirez, 89 N.Y.2d 444, 451).
The defendant's remaining contention does not require reversal.
ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORIO and COZIER, JJ., concur.