Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

The State, Petitioner, v. Edward M. Clarkson, Respondent.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM:

Respondent was indicted for assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct against a minor in the second degree (ACSC) and pled guilty to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). The Court of Appeals vacated his guilty plea. State v. Clarkson, 337 S.C. 518, 523 S.E.2d 817 (Ct.App. 1999). The State has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Court of Appeals' opinion. We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, dispense with further briefing and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Relying on its opinion in State v. Elliott, 335 S.C. 512, 517 S.E.2d 713 (Ct.App. 1999), the Court of Appeals determined respondent's guilty plea should be vacated because ABHAN is not a lesser-included offense of ACSC. This Court recently reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals in Elliott and held that ABHAN is a lesser-included offense of ACSC.State v. Elliott, Op. No. 25356 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed September 4, 2001) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 32 at 55). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals erred in vacating respondent's guilty plea.

REVERSED.

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CLARKSON
(Oct 1, 2001)