AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

SYLVIA BARICH, ET AL., appellants, v. BRUCE S. DOBOZIN, ETC., ET AL., respondents.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants made a prima facie showing that they did not depart from accepted medical standards in administering an influenza vaccine to the plaintiff Sylvia Barich and that the injection did not cause her injuries (see, Alicea v. Tuerk, 271 A.D.2d 557; Crisci v. Rastogi, 266 A.D.2d 335). The conclusory allegations of the plaintiffs' medical expert were unsupported by any competent evidence in the record and was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Rodney v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., A.D.2d [2d Dept., Aug. 13, 2001]; Fhima v. Maimonides Med. Ctr., 269 A.D.2d 559; James v. Crystal, 267 A.D.2d 429).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARICH v. DOBOZIN
(Oct 1, 2001)