AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF AMANDA B. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, petitioner-respondent; HOWARD N. (ANONYMOUS), ET AL., respondents-respondents; MONICA DRINANE, ETC., nonparty-appellant. (PROCEEDING NO. 1) IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN N. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, petitioner-respondent; HOWARD N. (ANONYMOUS), ET AL., respondents-respondents; MONICA DRINANE, ETC., nonparty-appellant. (PROCEEDING NO. 2) IN THE MATTER OF PAUL N. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, petitioner-respondent; HOWARD N. (ANONYMOUS), ET AL., respondents-respondents; MONICA DRINANE, ETC., nonparty-appellant. (PROCEEDING NO. 3) IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW B. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, petitioner-respondent; HOWARD N. (ANONYMOUS), ET AL., respondents-respondents; MONICA DRINANE, ETC., nonparty-appellant. (PROCEEDING NO. 4)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the orders of fact-finding and disposition are reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The Family Court erred in failing to hold a dispositional hearing. "The Family Court Act directs that a dispositional hearing be held as a condition precedent to the entry of a dispositional order" (Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. [Michael V.] v. James M., 83 N.Y.2d 178, 183; see, Family Ct Act § 1052[a]; Matter of Jeffrey M., 226 A.D.2d 1114). The failure to hold a dispositional hearing limited the Family Court's ability to make an informed judgment as to the need for alternative or additional dispositional remedies in the best interests of the children (see, Family Ct Act § 1045, 1047, 1052[a]; Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. [Michael V.] v. James M., supra; Matter of Lewis T., 249 A.D.2d 646, 647; Matter of Scott M. v. Janna C., 237 A.D.2d 603, 605).

Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, to hold a dispositional hearing and for a new disposition (see, Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. [Michael V.] v. James M., supra; Matter of Orange County Dept. of Social Servs. [Edward L.], 250 A.D.2d 853).

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, FLORIO and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF AMANDA B
(Oct 15, 2001)