AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

PARAMOUNT COMMUNICATIONS INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HORSEHEAD INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

We are in accord with McGuire v. Russell Miller, Inc. ( 1 F.3d 1306, 1313 [2d Cir]) insofar as it holds that when a contract provides for an award of attorneys' fees, there is no right to a jury trial on the issue of the reasonable value of such fees. The amount of, if not the right to, attorneys' fees raises post-judgment issues collateral to the merits in the nature of an accounting that are essentially equitable in nature (see, id., at 1315-1316; cf., Kaplan v. Long Is. Univ., 116 A.D.2d 508, 509). The foregoing is not to be understood to hold that there is no right to a jury trial on the issue of the reasonable value of an attorney's fees in an action by an attorney against a former client to recover fees (see, id., at 1313; Livingston v. Blumenthal, 248 App. Div. 138).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PARAMOUNT COMM. v. HORSEHEAD INDUSTRIES
(Oct 18, 2001)