ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Upon being stopped for multiple traffic violations, the defendant snatched Officer DelSalto's service revolver from his holster and tried to shoot both DelSalto and his partner. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15; People v. Corporan, 169 A.D.2d 643; People v. Colon, 161 A.D.2d 782).
The defendant's contention that the jury's verdict on two counts of the indictment are inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review, as counsel failed to raise the issue before the discharge of the jury (see, People v. Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745; People v. Stahl, 53 N.Y.2d 1048). In any event, the jurors could conclude from the evidence adduced at trial that when the defendant tried to fire at the two policemen, his intent was to seriously injure them, not to kill them. Accordingly, the jury's decision to acquit the defendant of attempted murder but convict him of attempted assault in the first degree was not inconsistent or repugnant (see, Poeple v. Hinckson, 266 A.D.2d 404).
The court properly imposed consecutive sentences on the convictions of attempted assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. There is no requirement that the victim sustain an actual injury to support a conviction for attempted assault in the first degree. Any or all of Officer DelSalto's injuries may be considered to establish assault in the second degree as a separate crime justifying a consecutive sentence (cf., People v. Parks, 95 N.Y.2d 811; People v. Ahedo, 229 A.D.2d 588). Moreover, once unlawful possession of a weapon is established, the possessory crime is complete and any unlawful use of the weapon thereafter is punishable as a separate crime (see, People v. Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 130).
The sentence imposed is not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN and COZIER, JJ., concur.