Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • For the plaintiff-respondent-cross appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Phillip M. Steans and Phillip M. Steans, S.C., Menomonie, and Matthew A. Biegert and Doar, Drill Skow, S.C., New Richmond, and oral argument by Phillip M. Steans. For the defendants-appellants-cross respondents there was a brief by James A. Pelish and Thrasher, Doyle, Pelish Franti, Ltd., Rice Lake, and oral argument by James A. Pelish. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Mary Dianne Greenley, Madison, on behalf of the Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy, Ins.
Judges
  • ¶ 1. PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • For the plaintiff-respondent-cross appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Phillip M. Steans and Phillip M. Steans, S.C., Menomonie, and Matthew A. Biegert and Doar, Drill Skow, S.C., New Richmond, and oral argument by Phillip M. Steans. For the defendants-appellants-cross respondents there was a brief by James A. Pelish and Thrasher, Doyle, Pelish Franti, Ltd., Rice Lake, and oral argument by James A. Pelish. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Mary Dianne Greenley, Madison, on behalf of the Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy, Ins.
Judges
  • ¶ 1. PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

S.J.A.J., Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant-Petitioner v. First Things First, Ltd. and Frontier Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Respondents, The Tra

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Justice Jon P. Wilcox, Justice N. Patrick Crooks, and Justice Diane S. Sykes would affirm; Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would reverse. Justice William A. Bablitch did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

S.J.A.J. v. FIRST THINGS FIRST
(Nov 6, 2001)