RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge
This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (filing 26) that Defendant's motion to suppress (filing 14) be denied and the objections to the Recommendation (filing 27), filed as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and NELR 72.4.
I have conducted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NELR 72.4, a de novo review of the Recommendation. Inasmuch as Judge Piester has fully, carefully, and correctly applied the law to the facts, I need only state that the Recommendation should be adopted, Defendant's objections to the Recommendation should be denied, and Defendant's motion to suppress should be denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (filing 26) is adopted;
2. The defendant's objections to the Recommendation (filing 27) are denied;
3. The defendant's motion to suppress (filing 14) is denied; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall provide a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the assigned Magistrate Judge.