AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

VASILIKI DRAPANIOTIS, ETC., respondent, v. 36-08 33RD STREET CORP., ET AL., appellants.

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which, in effect, denied that branch of the motion which was to vacate the plaintiff's note of issue, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellants.

A note of issue should be vacated when it is based upon a certificate of readiness that contains erroneous facts, such as that discovery has been completed (see, Garofalo v. Mercy Hosp., 271 A.D.2d 642; Cromer v. Yellen, 268 A.D.2d 381; Club Italia v. Hallon Fashion Trading, 268 A.D.2d 219). Here, the parties have, in effect, conceded that discovery in this matter has not been completed. Thus, the note of issue should be vacated.

BRACKEN, P.J., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO, SMITH and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DRAPANIOTIS v. 36-08 33RD STREET CORP
(Nov 13, 2001)