AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF FRANK CLIMENT, appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 22, ET AL., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The proper standard for judicial review of the respondents' termination of the petitioner's services as a probationary teacher is whether the administrative action was arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Kaufman v. Anker, 42 N.Y.2d 835; Matter of McCain v. Fernandez, 226 A.D.2d 380; Matter of Dillard v. Alvarado, 118 A.D.2d 644). The termination was not such an arbitrary and capricious act.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CLIMENT v. B.O.E., S.D. NO. 22
(Nov 13, 2001)