Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVID STRNAD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

The opinion of the Court was delivered per curiam.

OPINION

Appellant pleaded guilty to indecency with a child and was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision, pursuant to a plea agreement. Six years later, the trial court adjudicated Appellant's guilt and sentenced him to confinement for five years. Appellant filed a general notice of appeal. The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Strnad v. State, 39 S.W.3d 363 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st] 2001). The court held that Appellant could not raise issues on appeal because the notice of appeal did not comply with Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(b)(3). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review complaining of the Court of Appeals holding.

We recently reconsidered the applicability of Rule 25.2(b)(3) to appeals from the adjudication of guilt. Vidaurri v. State, 49 S.W.3d 880 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). The Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of this recent decision when it issued its opinion. We grant grounds one, two, and three of Appellant's PDR and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Vidaurri. The remaining grounds are refused.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STRNAD v. STATE
(Sep 19, 2001)