ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
That branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress the showup identification, conducted while the complainant was being treated in a nearby hospital, was properly denied. It was established at the hearing that the hospital showup was justified (see, People v. Blanche, 90 N.Y.2d 821; People v. Riley, 70 N.Y.2d 523, 529; People v. Rivera, 22 N.Y.2d 453, 454, cert denied 395 U.S. 964; People v. Matthew, 248 A.D.2d 557; cf., People v. Matthews, 257 A.D.2d 635) and was not unduly suggestive (see, People v. Williams, 258 A.D.2d 543; People v. Rementeria, 243 A.D.2d 736; People v. McBride, 190 A.D.2d 573).
S. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and SMITH, JJ., concur.