ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court properly determined that there was clear and convincing evidence of the appellant father's abandonment of his child based on his failure to visit the child or communicate with the petitioner agency during the six-month period before the filing of the petition (see, Social Services Law — 384-b[4][b], [5][a]). The father did not establish that he was unable to contact either the child or the agency, or that he was discouraged from making contact by the agency (see, Matter of Catholic Child Care Socy. of Diocese of Brooklyn, 112 A.D.2d 1039, 1040; Matter of Anthony M., 195 A.D.2d 315). In light of this holding, we need not address the issue of permanent neglect.
Furthermore, the Family Court properly determined that the child's best interests would be served by terminating the father's parental rights and freeing the child for adoption (see, Family Ct Act — 623, 631; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136; Matter of Crystal C., 219 A.D.2d 601; Matter of Desire Star H., 202 A.D.2d 582).
O'BRIEN, J.P., ALTMAN, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.