AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

RICHARD L. GOVER, respondent, v. ESCUDO CONSTRUCTION CORP., ET AL., appellants, ET AL., defendant.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified by deleting the provision thereof awarding the principal sum of $25,000 and substituting therefor a provision awarding the principal sum of $23,290; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to recompute the amount of interest due on the award.

There were sufficient facts on the record to support a finding that the appellants breached the fiduciary duty owed the plaintiff as their partner in an ongoing joint venture, even though the plaintiff's complaint asserted a cause of action sounding in fraud and not breach of fiduciary duty (see, Diemer v. Diemer, 8 N.Y.2d 206, 212).

Nevertheless, the court erred in awarding the plaintiff the sum of $25,000, based upon a determination that the appellants' expenses were $7,500. Instead, the evidence shows that these expenses totalled $9,210, $1,710 more than the amount calculated by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the award to the plaintiff must be reduced by $1,710.

The appellants' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOVER v. ESCUDO CONSTRUCTION CORP
(Nov 26, 2001)