AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. SHAWN SOUTHERLAND, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecution violated CPL 710.30 by not serving him with a list of its witnesses within 15 days after his arraignment is without merit. Since there was no police-arranged identification procedure, CPL 710.30 does not apply (see, People v. Richardson, 212 A.D.2d 743; People v. Kavanaugh, 207 A.D.2d 719).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and S. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SOUTHERLAND
(Nov 26, 2001)