AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JOEL RIFKIN, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

In addition to indictments in Kings, Queens, and Suffolk Counties, the defendant was indicted in Nassau County and moved to suppress certain statements he made to law enforcement authorities following his arrest. An order of the County Court, Nassau County, denied his motion for suppression, and the defendant entered a plea of guilty in Kings County.

The record does not support the defendant's claim that the Nassau County hearing court's denial of his motion to suppress induced his decision to plead guilty in Kings County (see, People v. Lloyd, 66 N.Y.2d 964; People v. McLaughlin, 269 A.D.2d 858, 859; People v. Gomez, 192 A.D.2d 549, 551).

RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, S. MILLER and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RIFKIN
(Dec 3, 2001)