AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

WALTER BRANCH, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN STUKES, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HENRY PITMAN, U.S.M.J.

Defendant Farrell's application to stay this matter as to him pursuant to the Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief Act ("SSRA") 50 U.S.C. (App.) §§ 501 et. seq., is denied without prejudice to renewal.

Farrell's current application, which was made by letter dated November 9, 2001, does nothing more than recount that Farrell is currently in military service and is stationed overseas. The law is fairly clear, however, that a stay pursuant to the SSRA is not appropriate upon a "mere showing that the defendant [is outside the jurisdiction] in the military service." Boone v. Lightner, 319 U.S. 561, 568 (1943). See also Hackman v. Postel, 675 F. Supp. 1132, 1133 (N.D. Ill. 1988); Guzman v. Warenda, 161 A.D.2d 1017, 1018, 557 N.Y.S.2d 588, 589 (3rd Dep't), appeal dismissed, 76 N.Y.2d 885, 562 N.E.2d 870, 561 N.Y.S.2d 545 (1990).

Accordingly, Farrell's application for a stay pursuant to the Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief Act is denied without prejudice to renewal. Any renewed application should be made by formal motion, including an affidavit or affirmation and memorandum of law.

SO ORDERED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRANCH v. STUKES, (S.D.N.Y. 2001)
(Dec 5, 2001)