JOHN D. RAINEY, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is the defendants' motion for extension of defendants have requested that the Court extend the date for filing responsive pleadings and motions to dismiss to thirty days after the resolution of the motion to consolidate they have filed in another case, Newby v. Enron Corporation, Civil Action No. H-01-3624 (Rosenthal, J.). According to the certificate of conference, this motion is opposed.
The plaintiff filed her first amended complaint on November 28, 2001. In that pleading, she also moved for a preliminary injunction against several of the defendants. This motion will be ripe for the Court's consideration on December 18, 2001. The plaintiff's response to the defendants' motion for extension, however, will be ripe on December 23, 2001. Consequently, it is ORDERED that the submission date for the defendants' motion for extension of time is set for Thursday, December 13, 2001, at 5:00 p.m. The plaintiff is hereby notified that the Court will deem the motion unopposed if she does not file a response on or before this date. See S.D. TEX. LOCAL RULE 7.4.
See S.D. TEX. LOCAL RULES 7.3, 7.4 (providing that parties opposing motions shall submit responses no later than 20 days from the date the opposed motion was filed).