Plaintiff alleges that following a minor traffic accident between the taxi cab in which he was a passenger and defendants' bus, he got out of the cab, approached the window next to the driver's seat, berated codefendant bus driver's driving and returned to the cab, whereupon the bus driver got out of the bus, approached the cab and punched plaintiff in the face through the open cab window. The record establishes that there were no passengers on the bus. The motion court correctly held that such allegations fail to show that the bus driver was acting within the scope of his employment when he punched plaintiff, and that defendants bus owners therefore cannot be held liable on the theory of respondeat superior (see, Stavitz v. City of New York, 98 A.D.2d 529, 531-532, citing Vargas v. Correa, 416 F. Supp. 266, 272; compare, Adams v. New York City Tr. Auth., 211 A.D.2d 285, 294-295, affd on other grounds 88 N.Y.2d 116, with Smalls v. New York City Tr. Auth., 264 A.D.2d 771).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.