ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Proctor, 79 N.Y.2d 992; People v. Smith, 73 N.Y.2d 961; cf., People v. Samms, 95 N.Y.2d 52). In any event, the County Court substantially complied with the requirements of CPL 400.21 (see, People v. Bouyea, 64 N.Y.2d 1140). The County Court's failure to specifically ask the defendant if he wished to controvert the allegations in the predicate felony statement was a harmless oversight, as the defendant admitted he was the person convicted of the prior felony, the sentence promised as part of the plea agreement was based on his status as a second felony offender, and he has not alleged any grounds to controvert the predicate felony statement (see, People v. Hickman, 276 A.D.2d 563; People v. Mann, 258 A.D.2d 738).
The defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636), and in any event, is without merit (see, People v. Hickman, supra).
O'BRIEN, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT and SMITH, JJ., concur.