The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea without a hearing and without appointing new counsel. Defendant was afforded a sufficient opportunity to present his assertions by means of his written motion, upon which he did not elaborate, and the court gave the motion proper consideration (see,People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v. Colon, 283 A.D.2d 193). The motion consisted of vague and conclusory allegations of innocence, lack of comprehension and ineffective assistance of counsel, which the court described as "boilerplate papers that are prepared within the prison system". The court, which had also accepted the guilty plea, was entitled to rely on the plea colloquy, which contradicted defendant's assertions.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.