PER CURIAM.
The matter before the Court is the Request for Reconsideration of "Order of Dismissal" filed November 7, 2001 ("Request"), filed November 19, 2001, by Appellant Marjorie Louise Haworth. No response to the Request has been filed. The Court notes that it previously construed the Appellant's Objection and
Reply to Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Purported Notice of Appeal from September 13, 2001 Order Denying Motion to Dismiss ("Objection"), filed November 13, 2001, as a motion to reconsider this Court's Order of Dismissal and denied the Objection by order entered November 16, 2001. The Court's local rules prohibit successive motions for rehearing. 10th Cir. BAP L.R. 8015-1. However, the Court will not penalize the Appellant for its construing the Objection as a motion for reconsideration, and the Court will treat the Request as the Appellant's first motion for reconsideration.
The Court further notes that the Appellant has filed a Memorandum alleging that she was prejudiced by this Court's untimely receipt of her Objection. The Court has considered the allegations of the Memorandum and concludes that the Appellant was not harmed by any delay in this Court's receipt of her Objection. This Court gave full consideration to the Objection when it entered its order denying the Objection, and that order will not be overturned.
Regarding the Request, the Court has reviewed the Request and concludes that it must be denied. The appealed order is interlocutory and is not a proper subject for this Court's jurisdiction.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Request for Reconsideration of "Order of Dismissal" filed November 7, 2001 is DENIED.