AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner-respondent, v. TATYANA SULEYMANOVA, appellant; MOISHE SVERDLIK, et al., additional respondents-respondents.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

CPLR 4311 provides that "[a]n order of reference shall direct the referee to determine the entire action or specific issues, to report issues, to perform particular acts, or to receive and report evidence only." This court has held that "a Referee's authority is derived from the order of reference and a Judicial Hearing Officer who attempts to determine matters not referred to him [or her] by the order of reference acts beyond and in excess of his [or her] jurisdiction" (McCormack v. McCormack, 174 A.D.2d 612, 613).

While the order of reference at issue authorized the Judicial Hearing Officer only to make a determination as to the "matters raised by the petition and the responses thereto", his decision was based upon a matter not raised in the petition. Therefore, the order appealed from must be reversed and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court for a new hearing (see, Al Moynee Holdings v. Deutsch, 254 A.D.2d 443).

O'BRIEN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE EAGLE INSURANCE v. SULEYMANOVA
(Dec 17, 2001)