AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. LEE D. Wight, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

DAMERELL, Judge.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302.

On December 14, 2001, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2001, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default judgment is granted and hereby entered in accordance with the proposed judgment by default filed herewith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. WIGHT, (E.D.Cal. 2002)
(Jan 3, 2002)