ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff failed to object to that part of the jury charge that he challenges on this appeal. Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to preserve this issue for appellate review (CPLR 4110-b; CPLR 4017; CPLR 5501; see, Cavuto v. Lilledah, 161 A.D.2d 853; Petosa v. City of New York, 52 A.D.2d 919). In any event, the plaintiff's contention is without merit.
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
ALTMAN, J.P., ADAMS, TOWNES and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.