AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE APPLICATION OF TERENCE BODDIE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, FOR A JUDGMENT, ETC., v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

This proceeding challenges the determination made by the Parole Board after a hearing held on November 17, 1998, which was affirmed on appeal by the Division of Parole on July 19, 1999. On November 8, 2000, petitioner appeared before the Board for his next scheduled parole hearing and the Board, once again, denied parole. In view of petitioner's reappearance before the Parole Board, the instant appeal is moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Aviles v. Travis, 282 A.D.2d 787; Matter of Feneque v. New York State Div. of Parole, 252 A.D.2d 469).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE BODDIE v. N.Y.S. DIV., PAROLE
(Jan 17, 2002)