AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JOHN PATTERSON, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to move to vacate his plea (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Passero, 222 A.D.2d 858). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. McCann, 289 A.D.2d 703 [3d Dept., Dec. 13, 2001]; People v. Rowe, 284 A.D.2d 796; People v. Otero, 199 A.D.2d 342).

SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PATTERSON
(Jan 28, 2002)